When you clean house, the rats scurry!
Henry Waxman and the Democratic Congress having a field day, twisting facts, and keeping a non-story alive while Valerie Plame sells her story to movies and books for $2.5 million, and her husband gets his also with his book -
Fitzgerald had already managed to put a Republican away with false information and lies. He said Tim Russert, he said Libby - that Russert had told him about Valerie Plame. Russert said “NO” - who lied? Did Russert appear before the Grand Jury? Libby did. I don’t believe Russert ever did. Accidentally landed on MSNBC - saw a Democratic news media lackey licking his lips, practically like a cat, giving his biased comments. Then of course, I turned the channel. ABC, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC having a GREAT ol’ time with the Valerie Plame story - now her movie will do even better, and she and Joe can give more to the Democratic party than they have been giving.
I think that many of the FBI, CIA, and State Department personnel have been working against the administration since the change in 2000. I wish that the Bush administration had not only gotten the U.S. Attorneys changed for new faces, but would also have cleaned house at the CIA, FBI, and State Department. There are many of these people who were involved in the Ruby Ridge massacre, and the Waco massacre - also in the Pockets Berger affair, and are still in their jobs, some even in higher positions. In my opinion, all government personnel should be denied the rights to give to political parties or individual campaigns, and if they do, their campaign gifts would have to be published for ALL to see. I would like to see an investigative reporter do a story on the leanings and political contributions on all government employees held over in the FBI, CIA, and State Department, especially to see who is making classified information available to The New York Times for them to put out in a treasonable manner.
I know the inJustice Department must have someone in a high place able to have incidents, e.g. Pockets Berger, settled with no punishment for an act of ESPIONAGE. The Democrats are more concerned with an act they call “release of classified information” on 
Valerie Plame, which is not classified at all, than Pockets Berger, who actually stole classified documents to keep the 9/11 commission from seeing them, to keep people from seeing the criminal acts of Pockets Berger, and to ensure that they wouldn’t be seen so as not to tarnish the Clinton legacy - a legacy ensured by the left-leaning media to be seen as it never was. His legacy has an odor worse than rotting fish. History being written by this liberal media scares the h— out of me. My concern for my children, their children, and on and on because of a planned propaganda message put out by these progeny of Joesph Goebbels is real and not imagined.
Is there a good prosecutor in the house?
I have a request for a good lawyer… not for me, but to let all of us rednecks know how Mr. Libby got convicted. From the transcript of the trial, I have these questions and 
statements:
- How many of the witnesses came back to correct their testimony because they had forgotten and had to change what they had originally said?
- How many came back and had remembered from practically nothing to a long winded dissertation on what they now remember?
- Was one of the jurors, a Mr. Dennis Collins, a friend of Tim Russert and Bob Woodward (two persons who dislike the Bush administration)?
- Was the defense attorney crazy for allowing this man to be on the jury - a known democratic activist? Sounds like the whole case is ‘he said, she said’.
- Was Tim Russert brought before the grand jury because of his known dislike of the Bush administration and his biased presentation of the news concerning the Bush administration? Did Tim Russert lie?
- State Department official, Richard Armitage - admitted he was the one that outed a supposed C.I.A. official who should have been fired because of her and her husband’s political action, which is against the law for C.I.A. personnel to get involved in politics - hmmmm
- Did Richard Armitage hold back his part in the investigation in outing Valerie Plame to help Fitzgerald in his effort to prosecute someone in the Bush administration?
- A State Department official, Richard Armitage, known to have been working against the Bush administration since Bush was elected - is he tenured? If not, why didn’t Bush fire him?
- Was Fitzgerald paid off to pursue this case?
- Clinton lied to the world on TV and wagged his finger at everyone.
- Ole Harry has a lot of nerve asking Mr. Bush not to pardon Mr. Libby after all the scum that Clinton pardoned, and after his land deals that he hasn’t been brought to justice for and of course won’t be.
- Was there a prosecutor appointed to the case of Pockets Berger for his act of espionage? If so, whose idea was it to just give him a slap on his hand?
- Seems that only border agents and Republicans are eligible for the treatment.
- Will a prosecutor ever be assigned for William Jefferson for his bribery? He was just assigned to the Homeland Security Committee by Nancy Pelosi. Some choice!
- Then we have Jack Murtha, who never had to pay for his part in the F.B.I. sting, but has been in Congress ever since, blowing smoke and recently trying to start fires. Seems he thinks he is vulcan, god of fire and the manufacturer of arms and armor for gods and heroes.
Who IS in Whose Pocket?
I’m back to express my opinion. I hate blood transfusions, needles for blood tests, colonoscopies, upper endoscopies, and other fun things. At least they keep me around to bore a lot of people.
Let me start on the trial of Mr. Libby, prosecuting by someone on a real power trip. Is it true that someone admitted earlier they outed Valerie Plame and didn’t even get a slap on the wrist - just told to keep it from Libby so he prosecute him. Is this fair? Is this justice? Is this the error of miscarriages of justice? Is this legal to hold back information as in the Fitzgerald case and the Mike Nifong case? Is this prosecutorial misconduct? Is this Mr. Gonzales’s way of doing business?
Is prosecution of border agents doing their jobs the new, fun thing? Two are in jail for ten to twelve years for stopping a drug dealer who’d previously made many trips to bring more drugs in. Another border agent was cleared on appeal, but during his prosecution, lost his home, his family, and his job. The Gonzales inJustice department did what it thought was a good job. Oh, by the way… the drug dealer was paid thousands by our government. He now has a nice ranch in Mexico. Should he ever need any working capital, I’m sure he will take a little trip across the border with a few drugs to be sold for profit.
Note - there are a lot of ‘is’s‘ in this article. I was hoping that a few of these individuals being prosecuted could use Clinton’s reasoning and change the charges by using Clinton’s new dictionary meaning of the word ‘is‘, or they could use Mrs. Clinton’s “I don’t remember”, “I can’t recall”!
Gonzales’s Department of inJustice slapped the hand of Pockets Berger… no jail time for an act of espionage - was supposed to take a lie detector test, but here it is, almost two years later - still hasn’t taken it! Why not? We will never know which documents he destroyed.
Jamie S. Gorelick, a member of the 9/11 commission, formally of the Clinton administration, placed limitations on communications between the F.B.I. and other law enforcement agencies. In so doing, helped the terrorist to carry out their dastardly deeds. One of the 9/11 commission members, Lee Hamilton, takes a job with Pockets Berger’s firm. The lawyer who assured the 9/11 commission that Pockets Berger returned everything got a hefty promotion with the Justice Department. Speaking of pockets, who is in who’s pocket??
Sphere: Related Content
