Only liberals would want their children in these hands!

Obama and his administration are very slow in sending additional troops to Afghanistan, as his appointed Military Commander asked for.  He knew right away what he wanted to do on health care, but doesn’t have the time to decide on helping the young troops over ‘there’ and keep more of ‘them’ alive – choices too hard to make.  He has no problem with wrecking the country with his health care reform by adding a massive deficit to be paid for by our children, grand children and their children.   He is not the only one shorting the troops.  Both the Democrats and Republicans shorted the troops when they took $2.1 billion out of the defense budget for their own little earmarks, to get themselves re-elected.

Originally published 04:45 a.m., October 15, 2009, updated 09:02 a.m., October 15, 2009

U.S. troop funds diverted to pet projects

Shaun Waterman THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Senators diverted $2.6 billion in funds in a defense spending bill to pet projects largely at the expense of accounts that pay for fuel, ammunition and training for U.S. troops, including those fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to an analysis.

Among the 778 such projects, known as earmarks, packed into the bill: $25 million for a new World War II museum at the University of New Orleans and $20 million to launch an educational institute named after the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat.

While earmarks are hardly new in Washington, “in 30 years on Capitol Hill, I never saw Congress mangle the defense budget as badly as this year,” said Winslow Wheeler, a former Senate staffer who worked on defense funding and oversight for both Republicans and Democrats. He is now a senior fellow at the Center for Defense Information, an independent research organization.

Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican, called the transfer of funds from Pentagon operations and maintenance “a disgrace.”

“The Senate is putting favorable headlines back home above our men and women fighting on the front lines,” he said in a statement.

RELATED STORIES:
• Michigan town lobbies for Gitmo transfers
• Top Treasury posts stay empty in financial crisis
• VA Dept. hospitals botched treatments

Mr. Wheeler, who conducted the study, compared the Obama administration’s requests for funds with the $636 billion spending bill that the Senate passed. He discovered that senators added $2.6 billion in pet projects while spending $4 billion less than the administration requested for fiscal 2010, which began Oct. 1.

Mr. Wheeler said that senators took most of the cash for the projects from the “operations and maintenance” or O&M accounts.

“These are the accounts that pay for troop training, repairs, spares and supplies for vehicles, weapons, ships and planes, food and fuel,” Mr. Wheeler said.

Raiding those accounts to fund big-ticket projects the military does not want, but that benefit senators’ home states or campaign contributors, amounts to “rancid gluttony,” he said.

The administration’s budget requested $156 billion for the regular O&M account and $81 billion for O&M for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill passed by the Senate cut $2.4 billion from the regular account and $655 million from the war O&M fund.

Senate appropriators insisted that the O&M accounts, despite the cuts, do not shortchange the troops.

“The operation and maintenance title is fully funded,” Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel K. Inouye, Hawaii Democrat, said during the debate on the bill. “There is no shortage. … The committee is deeply concerned that the critical operational needs of our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines are met with the finest equipment available.”

Money for the Kennedy Institute was inserted by Mr. Inouye and Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat. Sen. Mary L. Landrieu, Louisiana Democrat, and Sen. David Vitter, Louisiana Republican, sought the funding for the World War II museum.

Whitney Smith, a spokesman for Mr. Kerry, said the earmark was “a worthy investment.”

“Sen. Kennedy served on the Armed Services Committee for 27 years, where he fought to deliver top-of-the-line body armor and armored Humvees to protect our troops and save lives. Educating Americans about these battles is a core mission for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute, which showcases one senator’s ability to make a difference,” Mr. Smith wrote in an e-mail. “This funding will help the Edward M. Kennedy Institute become one the nation’s pre-eminent civic educational institutions, and Sen. Kerry is proud to have worked with Chairman Inouye to make it possible.”

Mrs. Landrieu said she was “proud to fight” for money for the World War II museum, which is not just a “monument to the brave men and women who served during World War II,” but also “a constant reminder to future generations about the tremendous sacrifice of millions of Americans.” She added that the earmarked funds “will help to increase tourism to New Orleans.”

Beyond those two earmarks, the largest in the Senate bill are:

- $20 million for Humvee maintenance at an Army National Guard installation in Maine, sponsored by Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia J. Snowe, Maine Republicans. The senators said cuts in the maintenance program proposed by the administration would result in the “layoff of 175 employees in a region already suffering” from the recession.

- $20 million for the Maui Space Surveillance System in Hawaii, requested by Mr. Inouye.

- $25 million inserted by Mr. Inouye for the Hawaii Federal Health Care Network. Mr. Inouye’s Web site says the health care program “supports applied research, development and deployment of technology to improve access and the quality of care to service members, military families and impacted communities.”

Laura Peterson, of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan spending watchdog, told The Washington Times, “Earmarks like these take money away from other defense programs that the Defense Department actually wants. While military health care is certainly a worthwhile venture, it’s hard to see how a program located in Hawaii that openly favors Hawaii-based industries guarantees [the Department of Defense] the best value for such an exorbitant price tag.”

Mr. Inouye had a total of 35 earmarks worth more than $206 million in the final bill, and the ranking Republican on the committee, Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, sponsored 48 worth $216 million.

Mr. Cochran defended earmarking as part of Congress’ responsibility to direct government spending.

“I am not ready to cede the power of the purse to any administration,” he told The Times in an e-mail. “It is vested by the Constitution in the Congress.” He added that appropriators had “reviewed the budget request very carefully, conducted public hearings and reported the appropriation bills that the committee thinks will serve the public interest.”

In addition to the $2.6 billion in earmarks, the bill includes $2.5 billion for 10 Boeing C-17 cargo planes that the military says it does not need, and $1.7 billion for an extra DDG-51 destroyer not requested in the Pentagon’s budget proposal.

Mr. Coburn mounted a rear-guard action on the Senate floor to try to restore some of the money to its original purpose. One proposed amendment restored $100 million to the accounts by correcting the economic projections used in the bill to estimate future costs. That passed, but other amendments to prevent the use of O&M money to fund earmarks were soundly defeated.

Mr. Wheeler said senators had raided O&M accounts to pay for narrowly targeted projects in every budget since 2002, with dire results for troops on the front lines.

“Air Force and Navy combat pilots training to deploy are getting about half of the flying hours they got at the end of the Vietnam War,” he wrote in his analysis. “Army tank crews get less in tank training today than they did during the low-readiness Clinton years.”

Mr. Wheeler told The Times that the figures were drawn from the Pentagon’s budget justification.

Mr. Coburn said in May that the Navy had been forced to curtail at-sea training and flying because of a shortfall in 2009 O&M funds.

The White House Office of Management and Budget has called on lawmakers to reverse the cuts.

“These reductions would hurt force readiness and increase stress on military people and equipment,” the agency said.

The House approved its version of the bill in July. Ms. Peterson said that lawmakers still could restore the funding in the conference that reconciles the two versions of the bill.

The conference “presents a final opportunity for Congress to take their hands out of the cookie jar and put some dough where it’s really needed – protecting our fighting men and women,” she said.

This Congress is really the pits.  They gave themselves a raise and raised their budgets to help with their partying and flitting around to desirable locales.  They really put themselves out, seeing to it that the seniors didn’t get the cost of living adjustment.  I don’t know where they get this cost of living figure.  They must not go into grocery or drug stores.  But why would they when they can pay someone else to do it for them?

When Obama appoints Kevin Jennings to be in charge of safe schools, what does that say about Obama?  Remember when Obama had the charter schools stopped in D.C. so his daughters wouldn’t have to possibly brush up against the non-elites?  What a dad!  At least there is a group in Congress asking for the removal of Kevin Jennings.  If you don’t know his history, look it up:

Fifty-three House Republicans have written President Barack Obama asking him to remove “safe schools czar” Kevin Jennings from that position.

The lawmakers accused Jennings of “pushing a pro-homosexual agenda” and said that Jennings’s past writings exhibit a record that makes him unfit for the position.

“We respectfully request that you remove Kevin Jennings, the Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, from your Administration,” the Republicans wrote. “It is clear that Mr. Jennings lacks the appropriate qualifications and ethical standards to serve in this capacity.”

Jennings has come under scrutiny from conservative personalities like talk show host Sean Hannity for his handling of an alleged incident involving underage sex, as well as Jennings’s own reported personal history with drugs and alcohol — charges the GOP members echoed.

The letter was primarily assembled by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), and was joined by 52 Republican colleagues, including two members of leadership: House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence (Ind.) and House Republican Conference Vice Chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.).

Jennings, who founded the Gay and Lesbian Independent School Teacher Network (GLISTeN), was appointed by Obama to head the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, a position Jennings assumed in July.

“Kevin Jennings cannot gain the approval of parents who want their children safe and their schools drug free,” the Republican congressmen said. “You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.”

The Jennings controversy follows the Sept. 6 resignation of Green Jobs Czar Van Jones and the long-blocked nomination of Cass Sunstein as regulatory czar.

Find the entire letter, with signatories, below:

October 15, 2009

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President,

We respectfully request that you remove Kevin Jennings, the Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, from your Administration. It is clear that Mr. Jennings lacks the appropriate qualifications and ethical standards to serve in this capacity.

As the founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Mr. Jennings has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools—an agenda that runs counter to the values that many parents desire to instill in their children. As evidence of this, Mr. Jennings wrote the foreword for a book titled Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. Throughout his career, Mr. Jennings has made it his mission to establish special protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered students to the exclusion of all other students. The totality of Mr. Jennings’ career has been to advocate for public affirmation of homosexuality. There is more to safe and drug free schools than can be accomplished from the narrow view of Mr. Jennings who has, for more than 20 years, almost exclusively focused on promoting the homosexual agenda.

Equally troubling is Mr. Jennings’ self-described history of ignoring the sexual abuse of a child. In his book, One Teacher in Ten, Mr. Jennings recounts a 15-year old student confiding in him that he had a sexual relationship with a much older man. Mr. Jennings’ only response was to ask if the underage boy used a condom. As a mandatory reporter, Mr. Jennings was required by law to report child abuse, including sex crimes. Mr. Jennings cannot serve as the “safe schools” czar when his record demonstrates a willingness to overlook the sexual abuse of a child.

As the “safe schools” czar, Mr. Jennings is also charged with ensuring our schools and students are drug free. It is clear that Mr. Jennings is unfit to serve in this capacity, as well. His own history of unrepentant drug and alcohol abuse indicates that he is of the opinion that getting drunk and high as a young person is acceptable. In his memoir, Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son, Mr. Jennings describes his use of illegal drugs, without expressing regret or acknowledging the devastating effects illegal drug use can have on a person’s life.

Everyone that deals with the education of the most vulnerable must be a positive role model.  Our children are not blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject. Children presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents.  Kevin Jennings cannot gain the approval of parents who want their children safe and their schools drug free. You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.

Given these very serious issues with Mr. Jennings’ record, we urge you to remove him immediately.

Sincerely,

KING
Alexander
Aderholt
Akin
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Bartlett
Barton
Boozman
Broun
Brown, H.
Carter
Chaffetz
Coffman
Cole
Conaway
Davis, Geoff
Fallin
Fleming
Foxx
Franks
Garrett
Gingrey
Gohmert
Hunter
Issa
Jordan
Lamborn
Latta
LuetkemeyerMarchant
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris
Mica
Miller, J.
Myrick
Neugebauer
Olson, P.
Pence
Pitts
Posey
Rogers (AL)
Rooney
Ryan, Paul
Shuster
Smith, C
Smith, L.
Wamp
Westmoreland
Jones, Walter

When you see the czars Obama appoints, don’t it make you wonder?

This administration talks about the fact that the leader of Afghanistan was elected by fraudulent voting… HEY, WHAT’S NEW?  Did ACORN fraudulently vote in Obama?  Could be.  With ACORN’s fraud and those voters who voted in Obama because of their desire to break the color bar, which was good intent, look what it brought us.  Who’s sorry now?  Anyone who thinks that Obama has ever stopped campaigning and planting questions in the audience, check today in New Orleans.  Has he gone to any state that he didn’t win since the election?  Does it make you wonder why he wants the leader that was removed in Honduras, President Manuel Zelaya, to be returned to power even though he tried to overturn their constitution to retain power?  Their supreme court threw him out.  Does Obama have a similar desire for power and would he go against OUR Constitution?

We know there is no transparency, as he promised.  He has lied and denied since being in Office.  He went on the Letterman show – could they be of the same stripe?  Look at the czars he appointed.  Is Code Pink keeping Obama from sending troops to Afghanistan?  Wonder why Obama never stopped by Mississippi to see THEIR Katrina damage.  Could it be he didn’t carry Mississippi in the election?

Obama: O Captain! My Captain!

UAW now holds controlling interest in Chrysler thanks to the machinations of Obama and the fear he has instilled on Wall Street and in the banking industry.  I have owned Chrysler products in the past but never will again.  The unions have destroyed auto, steel, and airline industries and I am frankly sick of them being allowed to do this.  At present I own a GM product, but it will be the last I ever own.  I will buy, from now on, only cars built by a non-union company.  I would imagine that many of the demonstrators of April 15th for which Obama holds such contempt will follow the same policy.  People will be pushed and vilified for just so long and then they will revolt, drawing on the character and integrity they practice and will continue to do so.  I know that there is no character or integrity in the Obama cabinet and in Obama himself, so expect nothing from them as far as their concern for their country but only for fulfilling their own needs and desires.

Recently I have heard Obama, again, speak of not wanting to import oil from foreign sources and yet he and the Democrats will not allow drilling offshore in Alaska or in the wilderness areas.  I know I have beat this issue to death but they have misrepresented their view on this and every time I hear them say this and not take any action I get angry.  They talk about consumer spending and rejoice every time consumers increase their spending.  They don’t even realize that the decrease in the cost of gas has allowed this to happen and they still won’t allow drilling to keep the price of oil and gas down and let the consumer get a break, consequently depriving the citizens of America a right to relief by accessing the products available and you might say their right to the riches of their own country.

Obama and the Democrats, instead, speak of solar and windmills and how this will be a blessing for the country.  There is no way that this will secure enough energy to fill the country’s needs.  Also they don’t speak of the costs and subsidies they are giving to these endeavors.  If people were aware of the monies that are involved and how much graft and corruption is paid and to whom it is paid, they would rebel and would demand that transparency would be shown as PROMISED.  Your power is in your vote.

I think many people think that they don’t have this power because their vote is made useless by the activities of ACORN, George Soros, and other shady organizations, but if we are committed to overseeing our voting procedures, demand that all voters have proper identification, and express ourselves FORCEFULLY, the politicians will HAVE TO PAY ATTENTION.  Even if you vote for the side that has the help of ACORN and others of the same ilk, you should demand honesty.  As honesty goes, so goes the country.  Don’t let it slip away.

More scientists say global warming does NOT exist than those that say it does and yet it is forced down our throats.  And those of us that think know this is only for filling the pockets of people such as Al Gore and crooked companies such as GE, who plan on making MILLIONS by the building of windmills and participating in the solar program.  Many politicians and crooked companies will enjoy the increasing of their riches by this program.  Other than oil, coal, and nuclear, the only way we will get the energy we need if for some technological advances in batteries, possibly the ability to remove hydrogen from water efficiently and in great amounts, or some other advance in obtaining energy.

If we could capture all the hot air in Washington and wring all the energy out of the lies told we wouldn’t need to worry about energy EVER – no transparency and broken promises are lies in themselves.

Divide and Conquer - is that what his smile is about?

This talk of holding people responsible for their actions – no one is above the law – Clinton gave perjured testimony – let’s go back and send him to jail.  The two embassy bombings, World Trade Center bombings, USS Cole bombing, the 9/11 all lay at Clinton’s and his adviser’s doors.  Jamie Gorelick and Janet Reno should also be prosecuted for Waco and Ruby Ridge and the 9/11 attack.  Pockets Berger should be sent to jail for stealing State secrets, the same sentence spies get.  Many of this whole pack of advisers were with Bill Clinton that are now Obama’s advisers.  Let’s go back to Truman and his advisers and the dropping of two atomic bombs, the taking over of the steel mills – should we prosecute them in absentia?  Then of course FDR took many unlawful actions, and took away habeas corpus from thousands of Japanese Americans and placed them in concentration camps.  I think that’s what Janet Napolitano wants to do with Conservatives and veterans.  The Japanese Americans didn’t fight back, but I have an idea the Conservatives WILL FIGHT BACK!

JFK advisers had him take away the air cover for the Cuban Freedom Fighters, and we know what happened.  Then because of that he put us in danger from the nuclear weapons Russia placed in Cuba.  He sent us in to the Vietnam war without going before Congress.  It was continued by LBJ and Nixon.  Whose fault was it?  Why not go back to Lincoln?  He took away the rights of habeas corpus, had soldiers shot that fell asleep while on guard duty, no matter the circumstance.  Should all these past Presidents be prosecuted and all their advisers also prosecuted is beyond common sense and logic.  One more thing, should President Taylor be prosecuted for the Trail of Tears and hundreds of thousands of dead Cherokees?

When Obama was elected would he have said he was elected for taking up partners with DailyKos, MoveOn.org, Huffington Post, and George Soros?  Will he ever be his own man?  I honestly don’t think so.  He was going to unite the country, do away with partisanship – what kind of idiots does he think we are?  He is the GREATEST divider of this country there ever has been.

Now let’s talk about the culture of corruption in Congress now.  A new graduate to this culture is Dianne Feinstein and another just recently added was Jane Harman.  They joined John Murtha, Charles Rangel, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Jerry Nadler, Barbara Boxer, Roland Burris, Chris Dodd, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, Gregory Meeks, and Patrick Leahy.  Several of these were the ones who would not allow any oversight to be made regarding Fannie and Freddie, could also have a bearing on the current suicide od David Kellerman.  It’s not only Congress, but our smiling Cheshire cat, Obama, harming the American people.  He undercut the CIA and the military and does it smiling – makes you wonder if that smile is covering up some kind of sinister actions being taken that no one is aware of.

Obama’s intelligence man, Dennis Blair, came out with a statement pointing out that good info was obtained that protected the American people by the interrogation of the al-Qaeda terrorists.  Now it seems, to please his boss, he is doing some back-tracking.  Apparently he is gutless and won’t stand on his own principals and character.  He fits right in with the rest of the Obama administration.  Too bad Obama’s people didn’t have the character and honesty of Miss. California, who wouldn’t try to be politically correct to obtain the Miss. USA crown.  There is no character or honesty in the Obama administration.

Now let’s talk about the bailout with the corruption being planned and used.  GM that should have declared bankruptcy is being given bailout money, not for GM but for the unions, and it continues as payback for the unions support of Obama during the campaign.  The unions’ demands in salary, work rules, pension benefits, and health care have killed the American auto makers.  The unions in New York, according to the Mayor, are bankrupting the city and, of course, they were the reason the airlines had to reorganize and go through bankruptcy to survive.  The unions destroyed the steel industry, and the Democrats want to pass Card Check so every company in the United States can face the same fate.

John L. Lewis must be turning over in his grave to see how his union has rolled over for Obama, allowing him to destroy the coal industry and allowing the Senators and Congressional Representatives in their state to go along with Obama for the destruction of the coal industry.  Even Governor Rendell in Pennsylvania is stabbing the coal industry in the back.  But Pennsylvania Congressman Murtha called them rednecks and racists and they still voted for him, so I guess they won’t make their Senators and representatives vote for their wishes.  Constituents don’t count for anything.

Bush put in school vouchers so poor children could get a good education – also put in No Child Left Behind.  The teachers unions voted Obama in to take back their students so they could keep them in mediocrity and keep their power.  I don’t think Obama wanted his children being forced to associate with poor children so he had his education appointee kill the voucher program in DC.  Bush was the best friend those children ever had.  He was also the best friend Israel ever had, and they still prefer Obama – STRANGE.

• Co2 is now dangerous to the climate per the freaks at the EPA.  Would seem to save ourselves we must destroy all trees and plants that take in that wonderful Carbon Dioxide and turn it into oxygen.  We live in dangerous times!
• Congress so keen on holding hearings – should do it on worthwhile projects such as Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Jane Harman, Dianne Feinstein, Timothy Geithner, Barney Frank, and other administration officials who broke laws.

Let us entertain you!  We're here for your viewing pleasure or your liberty - whichever comes first.

Global warming – the BIGGEST scam EVER and no one is allowed to question it.  It will cost the average American family around $4000 when all its required changes are in place.  Ethanol is already costing each family, in food costs, about $1000 a year.  The cap and trade or carbon tax will cost each family, whether rich or poor.  It won’t be called a tax, but will be passed on in electricity bills and costs of gas for transportation to work, shopping, doctor visits, day care, etc.  and Obama says he won’t tax 95 percent of American citizens.  He LIES.  He says and has said many lies, not only to confuse the electorate, but for ulterior motives.

You would think with all the costs attached to global warming, a Congressional committee would hold hearings and invite all scientists to participate, whether agreeing with the global warming fanatics or disagreeing.  It seems that this Democratically controlled Congress will brook no input from the Republicans or any other source that doesn’t agree with them.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid will go down in history as doing more harm to this country than any previous Speaker or Senate Majority leader EVER and will live in infamy long after they have left the scene.  There is no hope for defeating Nancy Pelosi, as her constituents are a bunch of mindless robots.  However, I think that efforts should start immediately to defeat Harry Reid.  That can be done and should be done.  In short, the attendees of Congress, both Democrat and Republican, and the Obama administration, as it pertains to their duties and responsibility to their constituents, are mindless, miserable failures.  They have abandoned any pretense of having the best interest of their country at heart.  Their self-interest is what they are looking out for.  Perhaps their constituents will wake up and vote them out and their replacements will perform the tasks they are elected for.  We can hope.

History will not forget how we lost our freedoms in a 4 year upset.

It amazes me how Obama, whatever actions he takes, if anyone questions him he says “That’s what they voted me in for.”  Bullsh**!  I guess he would say that having an administration composed of tax cheats and low-lives is what he was voted in for.  He would, I am sure, say that Janet Napolitano, declaring all Republicans a risk to the country and a danger, was what he was voted in for.  Now it’s my turn to say that Democrats are a danger and a risk to the country.  I will go further and say that Obama, himself, is a risk and danger to the country.  However, he is much less a risk as President than his second-in-command would be, a known liar and plagiarizer, Joe Biden.  Then, of course, next-in-command would be Nancy Pelosi, undoubtedly the most arrogant and poisonous individual ever born.  So I say… it is VERY important for the Secret Service to keep Obama safe.  In other words, he is the lesser of three evils.

As far as Obama’s promise to not tax 95 percent of Americans – sounds good – got him elected by the ‘gimme’ generation, but it’s a lie.  He, himself, has said that should his carbon tax be passed, it will add hundreds to monthly electric bills and increase the price of gas.  Is that a tax or is that getting screwed?  The Democrats are already taxing the American people except for city dwellers and elitists who take cabs and limousines, a lot of the time at tax payers’ expense.  This tax is made by not allowing drilling for oil, planning on the taxing of coal to eliminate the use of it, placing obstacles in the path of building nuclear plants, use of solar and wind for electricity that will increase the price of electricity and make us more dependant on weather conditions.  This is being done because of supposed global warming that doesn’t exist.

Right now, believe it or not, we are in a period of global cooling, a natural phenomenon, but you never hear this mentioned by a Congress intent on spending and hoping they can obtain some of the money for themselves and/or their campaigns.  We don’t really know if some of them may not be bad, but why take a chance?  Vote them ALL out!

Now that myself and all Republicans are considered a threat to the country, I would like to make a few observations:

I would say we are in danger from Democrats – think about it.  ACORN workers slashed tires on Republican workers’ vehicles in past election, forced their way into banks and forced the banks to make loans to people who couldn’t afford them.  They have been nothing but law breakers.  The President hung out with Weather Underground members who are now teaching professors, followed the values and beliefs of a radical pastor, also was friends with Louis Farrakhan – is it any surprise that he would be glad to hang out with Ortega and Chavez?  As a political organizer, he guided the law breaking of ACORN and defended them in court.  He associated with Rezko and other criminals and broke a few laws himself.

Janet Napolitano, instead of pointing at dangerous Conservatives, try looking at muslims, ACORN, and low-lives in the Obama administration.  During the election, the majority of the English people thought Americans practiced racism, I say Obama practices racism.  The day the English, French, or Spanish have a muslim prime minister is the day they can call us racists.