Crusades To Kill Morals and The Teardrops Parade
One thing I have noticed this time versus when he was President - he gets more red-faced and mad now than then because he doesn’t have a staff around him to protect and use the words “out of context” for his cover. Let’s face it, women and Perot put Bill in, and now he is out trying to use his charm to help Hillary get the women’s votes.
Hillary is showing her softer side and appearing on tv teardrop shows to enhance her appeal to women voters, and it seems to be working, God forbid. Another thing that seems to be working is the Clintons’ spokesmen bringing up the race issue and Obama’s drug use when he was young, and which he has admitted to. The Clintons believe all’s fair in war and politics. In fact, they have a war room in their headquarters.
Just saw the Nevada caucuses and the South Carolina primaries - a few observations… The Huckster blaming his loss on Fred Thompson and also said McCain ran a decent campaign and inferred that Romney didn’t because he and Thompson brought up the Huckster’s record. I think both he and McCain’s record should be brought up repeatedly. The media and the debate moderators had a lot to do with Fred Thompson’s numbers.
Thompson was also responsible partly, but there is no question that the liberal media was pushing Huckabee, as he would be the easiest to beat by Democrats, and of course McCain has always been a media darling since he was beat by Bush, as they HATE Bush with a passion. Even Fox went along with the derision accorded Thompson. I wish he had enough funds to continue the race and would expand on his message. If he could do this, and the media gave him an even break, he would be the nominee.
As far as I am concerned, the only thing I welcomed from the South Carolina primary is that the lesser of two evils won. At least I might vote for McCain over Hillary. But if the Huckster won the nomination, I would vote for Hillary over him. One thing about Huckabee is he sure can talk. All those people from Hope, Arkansas can talk. Note the Huckster’s concession speech and Clinton’s speech at the Democratic convention in 1988. Hope, Arkansas is also the capital of sleaze. Hillary lived there.
Sphere: Related ContentCampaign wonderland - Hillary, that cheshire cat has your number!
Seems the Gallup poll shows Republicans are less mental and more balanced than Democrats. The explanation is easy… the Democrats are pessimistic and think dark thoughts. The Republicans are optimistic and think in more positive ways. This only enforces what I had already believed.
One of Huckabee’s campaign talkers says Huckabee is the real deal - what a laugh! He is a taxer, helpful to illegal immigrants and does not have a Conservative bone in his body. He is using his religion as his main political platform, which to me brings to mind what they call false prophets. I have always seen those who try to use their religion for gain as hypocrites. I don’t believe this is the right course that the Bible would have a REAL religious person to take. His being a Baptist minister has helped him in his soundbites and also to look so sincere when he speaks.
Too bad Iowa is playing into the Democrats’ hands to give him a win in Iowa and help him gain the nomination, the liberal media’s real desire, as he would be so easily beaten like a drum by Hillary, Obama, and even Edwards. I hate to say it, but I have never seen Iowa with a stellar performance in their supposed election in the primary.
As Gomer says, “Surprise, surprise, surprise!” Putin’s party walked away with the election. What do you expect from a communist country? He has a vendetta against the USA. The main thing we have to fear here is another communist named Hillary being elected.
From what I can see, from research that I have done on the Republican candidates, there are only three who agree with me on border security, on abortion, on terrorism, and on the military. In other words, there seems to be three Conservatives out there - Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, and Fred Thompson… at least I hope they are. On immigration, these are wrong - Huckabee, McCain, Romney, and Giuliani. On taxes, and use of Religion for votes, Huckabee is WRONG - not nice. Ron Paul is just an idiot. McCain is just too, too close to Feingold and Kennedy. He let the Democrats change campaign financing to their liking.
Just heard Hillary today saying “You can’t get a straight answer from Obama.” I nearly choked. I don’t think she has ever given a straight answer to anything. Her answer for Bill’s philandering was “It was caused by a right wing conspiracy.” Could it be frigidity or some other reason on her behalf? After all, she won’t bake him cookies.
I’m sick and I’m mad rhymes with AHMADINEJAD!
I think that George Soros, moveon.org, dailykos, and other clowns causing dissension and hate for their country should leave it. I would suggest they all go to Iran or hell - whichever they prefer.
The dean of Columbia University says “Hard questions will be asked by the students and faculty.” What a laugh! Most of the faculty are of the same stripe as Ahmadinejad… anything to embarrass the U.S.A. Columbia University, now allowed to be what it is and where it is by the deaths of thousands of volunteers of the Revolutionary War, and they allow this - what a travesty. I guess the amount of heavy thinking they do leaves very little for patriotism. This is only an abandonment of principal and honor by this university, who will not allow ROTC on its campus. The big money, supporters of this institution, should have their names embossed on the opposite side of the Vietnam War Memorial, and engraved on plaques at West Point, Annapolis, and the Airforce Academy so the servicemen will be able to know who their enemy is.
Seems one of the Democrats’ talking heads, Mike Allen of Politico.com, is already working on Fred Thompson on the off-chance he might face their candidate, Hillary Clinton. Keep at it Politico! Even Bloomberg.com is getting into the act. Let’s have the New York Times and Chris Matthews go after Giuliani, Boston Globe and Keith Olbermann go after Huckabee, and the Washington Post and David Gregory go after Romney. Then they can all embrace Hillary and her better half. The better half of a completely rotten apple is just as rotten. Now her handler is attacking Giuliani because of his family being dysfunctional. What in HELL would you call hers? She sure is no Lorraine Bobbit. I don’t know how the right wing was able to cause hubby Bill to be so over sexed, but there was, undoubtably, a vast conspiracy.
But even with all this, she stands by her man, and probably will stand behind him if she is elected. He will be her Rasputin and will pull her strings. I will say one thing for Hillary - she has it together. Her husband lost his cool being interviewed by Chris Wallace, but Hillary beat Chris like a drum. She used that interview as a forum for all her ideas and comments whether they make sense or not, while he sat there with his mouth open wondering what had happened. I never saw an interviewer or moderator abused so flagrantly by the person being interviewed. To believe her is to require the suspension of disbelief.
Sphere: Related ContentDebates are worthless - Give candidates TIME!
Saw the debate of the Republican candidates last night. Afterwards, I was left with a sinking feeling. They were far superior to the Democratic candidates, but none left me with the feeling I want him for my President. The one thing I couldn’t understand was what is Ron Paul, a libertarian, doing in the Republican debate? He got lots of clapping from people in the audience with his anti-war talk. I know that New Hampshire has the motto “Live free or die”, but living free doesn’t mean allowing al-Qaeda to kill us.
If they value freedom so much, they would not shirk from helping another country achieve the same freedoms and be a buffer against terrorism to ensure we continue to live free. That is, of course, their decision because of the freedoms we have fought for throughout history. Compared to how Saddam treated his people, King George (that we rose up against) was a pussy cat. People who have lived in freedom, at times, become complacent and don’t realize what they have. In other words, you never miss what you have until it’s gone. I would think they would at least empathize with others who long for freedom. To me, peoples’ right to live free is almost Biblical.
I have one objection to how these debates are fashioned, especially Chris Wallace’s approach, which is to try to stir up arguments within the candidates ranks, and try to generate hostility. That approach is ineffectual and a waste of time that could have been used for questions that had merit. Starting off the debate with what the candidates thought about Fred Thompson not being there was also a waste of time. One question I would like asked: Would they be concerned about how the rest of the world viewed us in the decisions they make? I would hope they would say it would have NO BEARING on their decisions. In other words, we are a sovereign nation and concern for world opinion should have NOTHING to do with OUR nation’s actions for OUR citizens’ safety and freedoms.
I realize the Democrats constantly worry about what the rest of the world thinks of us. The world’s last super power will never be loved and should not allow that to have a bearing on ANYTHING we feel we should do. I know that Clinton did, but he only cared about himself. He was a beacon to the young people, showing how anyone could be President and have their own intern. See attached:
Sphere: Related Content“Path To 9/11″ Producers Blame Clinton Campaign For Blocking Release
LA Times | Martin Miller |
September 5, 2007 08:16 AM
Emissaries are supposed to be above reproach and of good character
Back to the remote -
Haven’t been to MSNBC in awhile. Thought I would check it out. Was on a Tuesday and just happened to be, at that time, some propaganda against Fred Thompson, who isn’t even in the race yet, but apparently they fear his candidacy. Stayed awhile to see what else they were covering. Seems mostly it was praising Hillary and Obama. In a few months, I will check it out again.
Why the Republicans would open themselves to a debate sponsored by MSNBC and allow Chris Matthews to lead questions to promote the Democratic agenda is beyond me. I don’t think they should have a debate sponsored by ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, NPR, or PBS. I am sure the Democrats would howl if they had debates sponsored by the NRA, Christian Coalition, or The Washington Times. I think those just mentioned should sponsor a Democratic candidate debate. How droll! In other words, I, like many conservatives, don’t think they should open themselves up to questions trying to show themselves as war hawks, stupid, irrational, and unworthy of being Presidential.
I wonder who picked the questions from YouTube and posted them to be viewed by the Democratic candidates prior to the debate. Open book test or not? Political pundits are practically demanding that Fred Thompson declare his candidacy - why? So they could destroy his threat to their party. If I were he, I wouldn’t declare until October. This campaign season is WAY too long. I would also encourage the Republican candidates to have no debates prior to October.
I saw where Hillary said she would send Bill as an emissary to the world tobuild goodwill. Will she have him apologize before he leaves to Kathleen Wille, Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, and Monica Lewinsky? Could we get a copy of the C.S.I. report on the murder of Vince Foster? Also could we get a copy of the autopsy report by the medical examiner, both under the Freedom of Information Act?
A few questions:
- Where have the Hillary billing records they found in the White House been stored since they were found after missing for two years?
- Whatever happened to Kathleen Willey’s cat?
- Are the two state troopers who helped Clinton with his bimbo search still around?
- Is Whitewater now a thriving community?
- Who has the blue dress now?
- Whatever happened to the right-wing conspiracy that caused Clinton to behave in this manner?
- Is Betsy Wright still doing her job, taking care of the bimbo eruptions?
- Has there been any research into how many meanings the word “IS” has?
