The Berlin Wall has come down - will the truth come out?
As the Soviets built their wall to keep the East Germans from getting out, so is the LA Times building a wall to keep the truth from getting out. This goes hand in hand with all the other liberal media protecting Obama and keeping his past actions, past associates, and checkered past from getting out. I see an effigy of Sarah Palin hanging and an effigy of John McCain in flames and nothing is done. One of Obama is hanging and the Secret Service is all over it. Does our Secret Service have a political agenda of their own as apparently our Justice Department and Supreme Court does as it pertains to voter fraud? I no longer have any respect for our courts or Justice Department. In fact, I have scorn for them. Other people I have scorn for are those Conservative elitists knocking Sarah Palin.
"Mark my words - FDR gave first TV address in 1929..."
As far as I am concerned, the excitement engendered by her when she joined the McCain campaign is the only reason John McCain has a slim chance against The ONE. I don’t believe any of the others on the short list for McCain’s Vice Presidential pick could have brought him this far and brought the base home. So you Conservative elitists can go join your elitist liberal Democratic friends in their little cocktail parties and talk in hush tones about this woman who actually WORKED with her hands. This country bumpkin, even though she is a Governor who has the audacity to think she could come to Washington DC and be admitted to their circle of small minds and huge egos, just blows their minds – people such as Peggy Noonan, Ben Stein, Geroge Will, and the list goes on.
I guess the only thing that these people could abide is one of the Washington insiders they had met at one of their dinner, cocktail, and mixer parties. These people have the most massive egos and less humility than anyone except, possibly, Obama and his wife Michelle.
Now let’s talk about energy. There are all kinds of energy sources. One of these sources is that of the liberal media, who expend all kinds of energy in knocking McCain and Palin and endorsing Obama and trying to cover up Biden’s flagrant lies and verbal missteps in undermining Obama’s lies by putting foot in mouth. The thought of this plagiarist and stupid individual becoming President through some accident is really terrifying and something you have a right to lose sleep over. And yet, the most popular Governor and Chief Executive is knocked as being unreliable by the liberal media and the fake Conservative Washington insiders.
Another form of energy used is that of Bill Maher, Jay Leno, David Letterman, Saturday Night Live, and comics of lesser stature to demolish Sarah Palin and help the campaign of The ONE. Another form of energy is that lying offshore in ANWR, in the oil shale, in the western states, in the coal fields of which we have massive amounts, energy in the form of gas, jet fuel, and diesel fuels that will lead this country into prosperity UNLESS the oil speculators are allowed to continue raising the price of this commodity and continue increasing the prices of these products that have finally become reasonable in price and allowing people to spend their dollars on other things than fuel. The amount of money that speculators are required to use of their own to jack up the price of oil is infinitesimal and cries out for the need to change this by the SEC or Congress – whatever it takes. The amount of money these speculators steal from the American people is sinful.
The economy has been beaten down by the Democrats in the forms of Fanny and Freddy, refusing to allow offshore drilling, refusing to allow the removal of oil from shale in the western states, refusing to allow nuclear energy plants to be built, and the last but NOT least beat-down on America by the Democrats is they have been espousing propaganda, putting down the economy for political reasons for months and months. That includes the Democratic Presidential candidates. I don’t believe they put country first. I ask of all of you who feel that country first should be a view held by Republicans and Democrats to make it priority number one to place your vote.
May God continue to bless the USA and save us from Barack Hussein Obama!
I went to MSNBC and CNN after Sarah Palin’s speech and guess what? They were saying exactly what I thought they would be saying. The left-wing liberal media can be counted on to do the Democrats’ dirty work. These media arms of the Democratic party are suffering from collective apoplexy. Now even Fox News is shying away from tough talks for the Democratic nominee. For those of you who don’t know, the man who own Fox News, Rupert Murdoch, is a Democrat and assured Obama he wouldn’t get any surprise questions and would be treated courtiously, and then Rupert gave Bill O’Reilly his orders. Seems Murdoch doesn’t really like O’Reilly and doen’t like the tilt Fox had towards Conservatism. And as you can see, it’s changed. See attached:
Rupert Murdoch acted as peacemaker between Barack Obama and Fox News
helped broker a “tentative truce” between Democratic presidential candidate and key News Corporation lieutenant Roger Ailes, the boss of Fox News Channel, earlier this year, according to the media mogul’s biographer.
Murdoch, the News Corp chairman and chief executive, was forced to court Obama after the rising star of US politics rebuffed his initial approaches, it is believed because of what he saw as the derogatory coverage of him and his wife, Michelle, on Fox News, according to Michael Wolff.
The News Corp boss also advised Wolff, his biographer, to vote for the man who eventually became the Democratic presidential candidate during the New York primary earlier this year, saying: “He’ll sell more papers.”
These revelations are , which details contributing editor Wolff’s interviews with Rupert Murdoch over a period of nine months for his upcoming biography of the media mogul, The Man Who Owns the News.
After initially snubbing offers of a get-together with the media tycoon, made through the Kennedy family, Obama relented and a secret courtesy meeting with Murdoch was arranged at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York, according to Wolff.
When Obama eventually met Murdoch early this summer in secret, they were joined by Ailes, who runs News Corp’s Fox News Channel.
Wolff reported in Vanity Fair that during the meeting Obama and Murdoch sat knee to knee, with the older man offering the prospective candidate advice.
“Murdoch, for his part, had a simple thought to share with Obama. He had known possibly as many heads of state as anyone living today – had met every American president from Harry Truman on – and this is what he understood: nobody got much time to make an impression. Leadership was about what you did in the first six months,” wrote Wolff.
But Wolff claimed things were different when Ailes took Murdoch’s place.
“Obama lit into Ailes. He said that he didn’t want to waste his time talking to Ailes if Fox was just going to continue to abuse him and his wife, that Fox had relentlessly portrayed him as suspicious, foreign, fearsome – just short of a terrorist,” he wrote.
“Ailes, unruffled, said it might not have been this way if Obama had more willingly come on the air instead of so often giving Fox the back of his hand.
“A tentative truce, which may or may not have vast historical significance, was at that moment agreed upon.”
In the Vanity Fair article Wolff also claimed that Murdoch advised him to vote for Obama during the democratic primaries.
“Just before the New York Democratic primary, when I found myself undecided between Clinton and Obama, I said to Murdoch (a little flirtation, like a little gossip, softens him), ‘Rupert, I don’t know who to vote for – so I’m going to give you my vote. You choose’,” he wrote.
“He paused, considered, nodded his head slowly: ‘Obama – he’ll sell more papers.’”
Murdoch courting Obama marks something of role reversal from the mid-1990s, when UK prime minister-in-waiting Tony Blair actively courted Murdoch as part of his bid for power.
“This is a leap for Murdoch. Murdoch has traditionally liked politicians to come to him. His historic shift in the 1990s to Tony Blair came after Blair made a pilgrimage to Australia,” wrote Wolff.
“Obama, on the other hand, was snubbing Murdoch. Every time he reached out (Murdoch executives tried to get the Kennedys to help smooth the way to an introduction), nothing. The Fox stain was on Murdoch.”
However, the “Fox stain”, as Wolff calls it, does not appear to be one that Murdoch is so comfortable with any more.
Wolff wrote that the influence of Murdoch’s wife Wendi and the courting of more liberal figures in the media has raised a conflict in the News Corp founder, as he would love to build on his purchase of the Wall Street Journal by taking over the New York Times.
“He is spending time now in consideration of an even more far-fetched fantasy, the New York Times: he’d really like to own it too,” Wolff added.
“Now, everybody around him continues to tell him that buying the Times is pretty much impossible. There will be regulatory problems. The Sulzberger family would never … And then there’s the opprobrium of public opinion.
“But it’s obviously irresistible to him. I’ve watched him go through the numbers, plot out a merger with the Journal’s backroom operations, and fantasise about the staff’s quitting en masse as soon as he entered the sacred temple.”
This increasing desire to move for titles away from his traditional right-of-centre political power base is mirrored by a cooling toward Fox News Channel, according to Wolff.
“It’s life with Wendi versus life with Fox. (And, too, it’s the Wall Street Journal – and maybe the New York Times – versus Fox),” he wrote in Vanity Fair.
“Fox has been his alter ego. For a long time he was in love with the Fox chief, Roger Ailes, because he was even more Murdoch than Murdoch. And yet now the embarrassment can’t be missed – he mumbles even more than usual when called on to justify it; he barely pretends to hide the way he feels about [Fox presenter] Bill O’Reilly.
“And while it is not possible that he would give Fox up – because the money is the money; success trumps all – in the larger sense of who he is, he seems to want to hedge his bets.”
During the convention, Sarah Palin did herself, her party, and her country proud in her speech. You can see she scared the hell out of the Democrats. You know that their news media is going to try to demolish Palin, find cracks in her armor, and bring her down. Also, the Democrats are out in force, slobbering and saying the same old talking points they have been given to say over and over. It is so shallow and boring, you really get rather tired of it very soon.
I have some suggestions for Sarah Palin…First, avoid going on MSNBC and CBS. ABC is a toss-up. Given the opportunity, I think she should try to explain to the American people who don’t seem to be able to comprehend the need for oil drilling wherever oil is available in this country. Even if we could get alternative energy to serve all our needs, which won’t happen, we could use our oil to sell to the rest of the world and improve our balance of payments dramatically, and our dollar would also strengthen dramatically. Iran, at the moment, is converting their transportation vehicles to natural gas to enable them to sell their oil. I would think that our government would be as smart as the Iranian government, but I wouldn’t bet on it.
On another subject, what ever happened to all those radical lefties from the 60s that Hillary wanted an earmark to make a memorial for them? The majority of them went into teaching and they are now using their expertise to radicalize the youth of today. An instance of this is a terrorist named Bill Ayers teaching in the University of Illinois. He is not the only one of this ilk teaching in our colleges and universities, and guess who hired them? The shallow intellect of the youth of today, with their self-gratification, has lended itself to this dumming down of America. The Third Reich came to be with this same type of education. One of the things they have influence on is how the legacies of past Presidents are decided. An instance of this is Lyndon Johnson, who continued to carry out the Vietnam war that JFK had started – and yet he is the bad guy and JFK is the hero. JFK’s Bay of Pigs fiasco is never mentioned. Clinton’s legacy will be decided by those same imminent scholars. Between them there are Pockets Berger and well hidden or discounted happenings such as Osama being offered to Clinton, but Clinton turning the opportunity down as well as Clinton’s veto of drilling in ANWR, which would have had a bearing on the price of gas of today and the state of the economy.
These scholars of today, from the 60s, have treated and taught that Bush is the skunk in the wood pile, having a great effect. Unless and until colleges and universities are purged of left-wing radical professors, this country will be heading into socialism and the end to the dreams of this nation’s founders who pledged their lives and fortunes to it: E Pluribus Unum or out of many, one.
Oh, by the way… Teddy Roosevelt had five children, and if I’m not mistaken, they used the White House like a home, playing hide and seek and using the lawns as yards, and he wasn’t condemned for it.
Sunday, Chris Wallace confirmed that Fox is no longer Conservative in the way he treated Axelrod and Davis. He and the Democrats are still highly ticked off that McCain didn’t pick Lieberman or Tom Ridge. They lay it on cowardice. Calling McCain a coward is a stretch no reasonable American would ever make.
May God continue to bless the USA and save us from Barack Hussein Obama.
Not surprisingly, Bill and Hill are out in Iowa matching each other lie for lie. I guess they think the people in Iowa are even more stupid than the rest of the Democrats. I guess they think whatever they say will be accepted as truth in Iowa. Of course they all have Alzheimers and no memories. I know that ABC is really pushing for Hill. See attached:
Clinton Calls on Powell
From: blogs.abcnews.com
November 27, 2007 11:59 AM
Author: Ed OKeefe
ABC News’ Eloise Harper and Teddy Davis Report: Hillary Clinton often talks about but on Tuesday, the Senator said she would also call on Colin Powell.
“I have said I won’t even wait until I’m inaugurated, but as soon as I’m elected I’m going to be asking distinguished Americans of both parties — people like Colin Powell, for example — and others who can represent our country well, including someone I know very well,” Clinton told the predominantly black audience after receiving the endorsement of dozens of South Carolina ministers.
Contacted by ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Gen. Colin Powell was tight-lipped Tuesday when asked if he is open to Clinton’s invitation.
“I have not seen what she has said. I don’t know the context of it,” Powell told ABC News. “I have admiration for Mrs. Clinton but I have no comment.”
Powell, a well known Republican who served as President George W. Bush’s first Secretary of State, turned heads in political circles earlier this year when he confirmed that he has met twice with Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Despite having met with Obama twice, Powell told ABC News that he is not an adviser to any presidential candidate. Rather, he said that as a former Secretary of State he makes himself available to candidates of both parties.
In addition to having met twice with Obama, Powell said that he has also met with two Republican presidential candidates: Arizona Sen. John McCain and former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, whom he described as “a neighbor.”
Asked if he had ruled out a pre-primary endorsement in the presidential race, Powell left the door open.
“I’m going to do, what I’m going to do,” Powell told ABC News.
Clinton’s mention of Powell is rare and it comes as .
But at the same time the candidate was seemingly offering a bipartisan olive branch, she also touted her electability against the Republicans.
“There are some on the Republican side who are not exactly my fans,” Clinton said. “I am well aware of that. I’ve been fighting them for years and I’ve been the recipient of all those incoming attacks.”
“I’m still standing,” Clinton declared.
One of those 1990s foes, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., who led the effort to impeach former President Bill Clinton, predicted on “Good Morning America” that Senator Barack Obama, D-Ill., would win Iowa by a “surprising margin”.
You can read excerpts from that interview or watch the full video .
The endorsement from the ministers is important for Clinton in this state, where almost half of South Carolina’s Democratic primary voters are African-American.
The fight for votes in South Carolina and the rest of the primary states is expected to intensify in coming weeks. In early December, Obama will , while the former First Lady continues to dispatch her husband to build support.
It’s so nice when the press takes a stand. You can bet they won’t be lambasted by the Clintons after what one of their Democratic talking heads said about Tim Russert from NBC – that he needed to be killed because of pushing a hard question on Hill. The press should be apolitical and not afraid to ask questions of any candidate and their machines, whether private detective staff, I say their private detective staff, when actually it is Hillary’s staff used to keep an eye on Bill and get dirt on Bill’s victims by means of and not excluding house break-ins, killing of cats, inducing fear, suicide incidents, Filegate, Travelgate, etc.
Actually, if Bill Clinton killed Hillary and said it was an accident, the Democrats would insist HE take over the race. I can just hear Alan Colmes shaping this, like only he can do, to make everything the Democrats do the right thing – it’s not just Alan, but Kirsten Powers and others like Sheppard Smith, Maura Liasson, Juan Williams and Mort Kondracke.
I saw Chris Wallace’s interview with Fred Thompson and saw Thompson acting sullen like a Democrat, then complaining afterward, as the Democrats do, about FOX being so bad. FOX News has more liberals than all the other networks have Conservatives in total – you can probably triple that figure. If you counted all the liberals on FOX, you would find they out-number the Conservatives. If Thompson can’t take criticism, he then is too much like the Clintons.
Huckabee is too much like Jimmy Carter. Now he is saying if he is rising in the polls, it’s due to prayer and God’s intervention. That is one HELL of an ego! I have known a lot of Baptist preachers in my time – a lot of them in my family. And taken in total, their morals would be lower than those of politicians, lawyers, or the press. In other words, a lot of them are just plain rascals. It’s harder to catch them in a lie because they are masters of using their audience, especially the wives. Huckabee’s attitude towards taxes takes away his claims of being a Conservative. Also, his explanation of the ethics violations charges while he was a Governor SUCKS. Another problem is that he is from Hope, Arkansas – sound familiar?
The CEO of the Red Cross resigns after being caught in an adulterous relationship with one of his staff. He is paying well by losing his $500,000 yearly salary. Liberals are standing up for him saying that his morals shouldn’t matter as long as he was doing a good job. This is apparently similar to the case where a liberal woman said, after Clinton’s fiasco with Monica, that she would do the same for him as well because he was such a good President. I am sure this CEO’s wife will stand by her man as Hillary did, but Hillary don’t bake cookies.
I see where George Soros and moveon.org are turning their private investigators loose on Rudy Giuliani. See attached:
Giuliani billed obscure agencies for trips By: Ben Smith
November 28, 2007 09:43 PM EST
As New York mayor, Rudy Giuliani billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in security expenses amassed during the time when he was beginning an extramarital relationship with future wife Judith Nathan in the Hamptons, according to previously undisclosed government records.
The documents, obtained by Politico under New York’s Freedom of Information Law, show that the mayoral costs had nothing to do with the functions of the little-known city offices that defrayed his tabs, including agencies responsible for regulating loft apartments, aiding the disabled and providing lawyers for indigent defendants.
At the time, the mayor’s office refused to explain the accounting to city auditors, citing “security.”
The Hamptons visits resulted in hotel, gas and other costs for Giuliani’s New York Police Department security detail. Giuliani’s relationship with Nathan is old news now, and Giuliani regularly asks voters on the campaign trail to forgive his “mistakes.
It’s also impossible to know whether the purpose of all the Hamptons trips was to see Nathan. A Giuliani spokeswoman declined to discuss any aspect of this story, which was explained in detail to her earlier this week.
Asked about this article after it was published on Wednesday, Giuliani said: “It’s not true.”
He said he had 24-hour security during his eight years as mayor because of “threats,” adding: ” I had nothing to do with the handling of their records, and they were handled, as far as I know, perfectly appropriately.”
The practice of transferring the travel expenses of Giuliani’s security detail to the accounts of obscure mayoral offices has never been brought to light, despite behind-the-scenes criticism from the city comptroller weeks after Giuliani left office.
The expenses first surfaced as Giuliani’s two terms as mayor of New York drew to a close in 2001, when a city auditor stumbled across something unusual: $34,000 worth of travel expenses buried in the accounts of the New York City Loft Board.
When the city’s fiscal monitor asked for an explanation, Giuliani’s aides refused, citing “security,” said Jeff Simmons, a spokesman for the city comptroller.
But and travel documents obtained by Politico suggest another reason City Hall may have considered the documents sensitive: They detail three summers of visits to Southampton, the Long Island town where Nathan had an apartment.
Auditors “were unable to verify that these expenses were for legitimate or necessary purposes,” City Comptroller William Thompson wrote of the expenses from fiscal year 2000, which covers parts of 1999 and 2000.
, whose existence has not been previously reported, was also obtained under the Freedom of Information Law.
Long Island bills
The receipts tally the costs of hotel and gas bills for the police detectives who traveled everywhere with the mayor, according to cover sheets that label them “PD expenses” and travel authorizations that describe the trips.
New York’s mayor receives round-the-clock police protection, and there’s no suggestion that Giuliani used his detail improperly on these trips.
Many of the receipts are from hotels and gas stations on Long Island, where Giuliani reportedly began visiting Nathan’s Southampton condominium in the summer of 1999, though Giuliani and Nathan have never discussed the beginning of their relationship.
Nathan would go on to become Giuliani’s third wife, but his second marriage was officially intact until the spring of 2000, and City Hall officials at the time responded to questions about his absences by saying he was spending time with his son and playing golf.
The receipts have languished in city files since Giuliani left office, apparently in part because of City Hall’s decision to bill police expenses to a range of little-known city offices.
“There is no really good reason to do this except to have nobody know about it,” Carol O’Cleireacain, a Brookings Institution senior fellow who was budget director under Giuliani’s predecessor, David Dinkins, said of the unusual billing practices.
A Giuliani spokeswoman, Sunny Mindel, declined to comment on any aspect of the travel documents or the billing arrangements.
A Giuliani aide who would speak only on the condition of anonymity denied that the unorthodox billing practices were aimed at hiding the expenses, citing “accounting” and noting that they were billed to units of the mayor’s office, not to outside city agencies.
The aide declined to discuss Giuliani’s visits to Long Island.
The trips themselves were a departure for a mayor who had prided himself on spending every waking moment in the city and on the job, and offer a glimpse into the dramatic and controversial finale to his tenure in office.
Receipts show him in Southampton every weekend in August and the first weekend in September of 2001, before the terror attacks of Sept. 11 disrupted the routines of his city.
Both the travel expenses and the appearance that his office made efforts to conceal them could open Giuliani to criticism that his personal life spilled over into his official duties and his expenses grew in his final years in office.
It is impossible to say which of the 11 Long Island trips indicated by credit card receipts were to visit Nathan and which were for other purposes.
Eight of those trips, however, were not noted on Giuliani’s official schedule, which is now available in the city’s municipal archive and contains many details of Giuliani’s official and unofficial life.
The billing practices, however, drew formal attention on Jan. 24, 2002, when Thompson, the city comptroller, wrote the newly elected mayor, Michael Bloomberg, a confidential letter.
One of his auditors, he wrote, had stumbled upon the unexplained travel expenses during a routine audit of the Loft Board, a tiny branch of city government that regulates certain apartments.
Broadening the inquiry, the comptroller wrote, auditors found similar expenses at a range of other unlikely agencies: $10,054 billed to the Office for People With Disabilities and $29,757 to the Procurement Policy Board.
The next year, yet another obscure department, the Assigned Counsel Administrative Office, was billed around $400,000 for travel.
Increasing costs
“The Comptroller’s Office made repeated requests for the information in 2001 and 2002 but was informed that, due to security concerns, the information could not be provided,” said Simmons. Thompson took office in 2002.
Thompson also warned that travel costs had increased by 151 percent in Giuliani’s final fiscal year, to more than $618,000, a number which also includes police security on campaign swings for Giuliani’s abortive 2000 Senate run and trips to Los Angeles by Donna Hanover, who remained Giuliani’s wife and the city’s official first lady, in the fall of 2000.
Most of that travel also was billed to obscure agencies, though portions — much of it trips to and from Washington by Giuliani deputies — were accounted for more conventionally, with a more visible charge to the mayor’s office.
Thompson suggested Bloomberg “review … the cost of mayoralty travel expenses, given your administration’s focus on fiscal constraints.”
A spokesman for Bloomberg, Stu Loeser, said: “When we received the letter from the comptroller, we referred the matter to the Department of Investigations, as we would in any case like this.”
A spokeswoman for the Department of Investigations declined to comment.
The executive director of the Loft Board referred Politico to Bloomberg’s office for comment.
The first trip to Southampton appearing in the travel documents runs from Aug. 31 to Sept. 1, 1999.
Four police officers spent the night at the Atlantic Utopia Lifestyle Inn, according to an approval request for official out-of-city travel, billing the city $1,016.20.
Giuliani’s private schedule, available from the municipal archive, lists no events on Long Island that day.
The New York Post reported the following year that Giuliani “had long weekend visits with gal pal Judi Nathan at her Southampton, L.I., condo last summer, according to neighbors who said the mayor did little to conceal their relationship.”
The neighbors called their relationship and their time in Nathan’s two-bedroom condo overlooking Noyack Bay “an open secret.”
“Several residents of the condo sometimes asked Giuliani’s driver and members of his security entourage to turn off their car engines,” the Post reported.
That first trip was followed by at least 10 more, according to the travel and credit card documents.
One of those trips, on Aug. 20-21, 1999, included a fundraiser on the evening of Aug. 21. Giuliani’s four-man detail arrived 24 hours early, billing the city $1,704.43 at the Southampton Inn, according to their approval request.
More trips followed in the summer of 2000, after the mayor’s affair with Nathan became public and they were seen together publicly in Southampton. The trips accelerated in the summer of 2001, when he visited Southampton every weekend in August, as well as on Sept. 2.
Many of the trips show expenses only for gas, though his police detail billed the city $1,371.40 for the nights of Aug. 3-4, 2001, at the Village Latch Inn in Southampton.
Giuliani’s police detail also spent a night in Palm Beach, Fla., according to the bill for the American Express card under Giuliani’s name. The detectives spent $1,714.99 at The Breakers, a sprawling hotel and resort.
There is no indication that Nathan visited Palm Beach. Giuliani’s aide did not recall the trip.
The 2001 travel expenses were billed to the Assigned Counsel Administrative Office, a little-known unit of the mayor’s office involved in programs that provide lawyers to poor defendants.
None of the 2001 trips to Southampton appear in Giuliani’s official schedule. However, the schedule does contain a potential clue to his destination. Before three of them, Giuliani paid a visit to his barber, Carlo Fargnoli, on York Avenue near the mayor’s official residence, Gracie Mansion.
I will close this to be able to watch the CNN/YouTube debacle that the Republican candidates allowed themselves to be subjected to. May God continue to bless the USA and save us from Hillary.
I am eagerly awaiting the debate on Thursday for the Democratic Presidential candidates. I guess by now Hillary has a list of the questions and who is to be asked what. What else can Wolf do? He has been warned “Don’t pull a Russert, or else!” Look for her to knock the ball out of the park this time. I know we all hope so. Obama and John better be ready for some very embarrassing questions with political consequences.
Hillary has changed her laugh, her voice modulation, and all kinds of mannerisms to please her Democratic constituents. Will it work? We will see. The Democrats are still trying to snatch defeat out of victory, even with a bill they are working on today. Their worst nightmare is coming true. Iraq is turning around, and as one of the Congressmen said “If Iraq is considered to be becoming a Democracy, we will suffer in the election.” Wouldn’t that be sad?
I see where the question Hillary couldn’t answer has been settled by the New York citizens – no licenses for illegals. Let’s face it, the reason many people want this is to make possible voter fraud. Think back to all the efforts to use voter fraud by the Democrats in the past – signing up voters who didn’t exist and so forth. We know the majority of the American public are for enforcing our laws and making the border secure, however, the Democratic political machine do not really want this because they want to encourage Latinos to get amnesty and be another pawn of their political machine, as they have used other minorities. So, I would suggest that the questions posed to the Democratic candidates should include some as to their views on immigration.
One thing we know for sure – the Clintons always have the Chinese vote served up and they vote with their wallets. I guess they’re still grateful for the technology Bill gave them.
I don’t believe I heard Bush say one of the new Attorney Generals duties were to enforce the border. He listed all kinds of things he was responsible for. He didn’t mention his duties to enforce cities, towns, and states to follow federal law as pertains to sanctuary and not allowing federal laws to be enforced by their local authorities. The immigration department is the most inadequate and bribe-ridden department of the government, and that includes Congress. All candidates from both parties should be asked for their plan to save social security and solve the immigration problem. If they don’t want to do that, but talk in generalities, they should be ignored. What I would be interested in is if the Congress would pass a law making English the nation’s language. Make laws enforcing the federal laws that are being IGNORED, making sure they are to be followed or all government funds shall be withheld from cities, towns, and states not complying fully.
The outcry of idiots against depriving our poor illegals from obtaining drivers licenses is stupid and an inane argument. I keep hearing there are 12 million illegals in this country. I warrant if the truth be known, it would be more like 20 million. I hear people saying how the illegals pay taxes. That only helps a little bit with the costs of education and healthcare the American tax-payer has to assume. They are forcing many of our hospitals to close, and putting great pressure on the others. The one thing they never fail to do is send money home to help Mexico’s economy. For those who say illegal immigrants can’t harm us, what about the illegal who was able to work for the FBI and CIA and was a mole for Hezbollah?
Government agencies have become laughable. Leaks from CIA and FBI, spies like Hansen, this Lebanese woman, jokers like Joe Wilson and his wife with their nefarious actions, foreign service officials only wanting to serve in Bimini, Paris, or London, but not where there is any danger – who the hell do they think they are? If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Frankly, I am disgusted with our CIA, FBI, Immigration Department, State Department, Homeland Security, Congress, Senate, and ESPECIALLY our court system with the judges treating the perpetrators as victims and federal law means nothing anymore. I would say the new Attorney General has a job on his hands, but of course he has already gotten his instructions from the Senate, and the beat goes on.
One final thing… I see where Hillary is going to deny access to the media if they aren’t nice to her. Wouldn’t you think that works both ways? I guess we will see Thursday night.
May God continue to bless the USA and save us from Hillary.
