Mrs. Clinton talking about Obama, saying politicians should be what they say and responsible for what they have done. Does she mean Bill and his sexual peccadilloes? Heard a Democratic female analyst saying that Bill was just being gallant in defending Mrs. Clinton. Gallantry would be the last thing I would expect from Bill Clinton. Can’t you just imagine Bill on a horse jousting and wearing Mrs. Clinton’s colors? Sir Galahad he is not, but more like the Black Knight. See attached:

Your distinct personality, The Black Knight, might be found in most of the thriving kingdoms of the time. Your overriding goal is to win. You approach each task or situation as a contest to be won strategically and efficiently. Because you can control your feelings, it is not unusual for you to charm, as well as successfully delegate tasks and responsibilities to the more emotional types. You are often concerned with what’s in it for you. You seldom involve yourself in activities where you can not foresee a reward for your investment or effort. On the positive side, you can be analytically empathic and logically persuasive. On the negative side, you may be unemotionally manipulative as well as impulsive. Interestingly, your preference is just as applicable in today’s corporate kingdoms.

His attacks against Obama are carefully considered, measured, and planned to do the maximum damage. He is the master of lying, using lies and innuendo in his attacks, and as of right now, they are succeeding.

Obama needs his own Goebbels. Mrs. Clinton has a lot of them - the best being her husband. Mrs. Clinton and her husband seem to be based on the old concept of divide and conquer. The liberal media and the Democrats have been pushing McCain for the Republican nomination. It may be working. Think about their motive. Do we want to elect someone who the Democrats favor? I say that they are hoping to destroy the Republican party by splitting away the Conservatives who will not vote for McCain - another instance where they are using divide and conquer.

Now Huckabee is attacking Romney as McCain’s surrogate, I am sure setting himself up to be the Vice Presidential nominee. With a McCain/Huckster ticket, it will be the demise of the Republican party. The Democratic party can surely defeat a faux Republican ticket. As the primary continues, I can see Edwards becoming a stalking horse for Mrs. Clinton. Note their private meeting after the last Democratic debate. Carl Cameron, political guru on Fox, is in his own way trying to push McCain and down Romney. It has become so apparent it makes me wonder if he shouldn’t be called a member of the liberal media.

The polls are trying to cause a shift towards McCain. I wish we could rely on the polls, but unfortunately they are as shady as politicians and used as tools of the movers and shakers. I see all the old people of importance at one time trying to move McCain forward, such as Jack Kemp, Phil Gramm, and others. If they have to prop him up to get some influence back, then how can McCain campaign as his own man? In my opinion there is a glut of old timers in the Congress and Senate - so many of them are over 65 and have been in office so long because of all their safeguards for the incumbents. The greatest gift they could give for their country is to resign en mass.

Watched the debate by MSNBC with Tim Russert and Brian Williams asking four questions in sequence to Romney about his money. Trying to embarrass and harass Romney is disgusting and shows a lack of integrity and a political assassination by two Democrats. It was as if Chris Matthews was there, in person, with an axe. The questions asked and the tone and demeanor displayed to the candidates by the moderators can easily be seen as a vendetta against Mitt Romney.

The liberal media, New York Times, and all the other liberal rags are for John McCain, and they together are against Romney which means they don’t want any other candidate to go after Mrs. Clinton, and they also know, as most Conservatives do, that John McCain is a Democrat at heart. Romney must know by now that any debate moderated by Democratic channels will have missiles launched at him. The only change in this was when ABC’s debate, moderated by Charlie Gibson, showed no bias.

I can’t believe it was so important to Tim Russert to point out that Romney had his own funds which he had earned by working over the years. Can anyone doubt that Russert was using this against Romney? I know the Democrats want McCain, but the Republicans need someone they are for. Don’t forget, the Clintons have hundreds of millions between them. Have they used any of their own funds that they have amassed since getting into the White House?

To me it is fantastic how much they have amassed since leaving the White House and not having to work for it - cattle futures, lectures, books, and connections… connections… connections. Ask THEM Russert, if you dare. While you are doing that, also ask about Mrs. Clintons papers hidden in Bill Clinton’s library, the repository of Mrs. Clinton’s papers and the perfect opportunity for her to hide them. Reminds me of her billing records and how they disappeared. Even the papers in Vince Foster’s office were taken by Maggie Williams and Clinton’s lawyer. By not releasing her papers, she is only proving the positive that she is a shyster amongst other things.

Tim, you and Brian ask them questions of Bill Clinton and Mrs. Clinton if you dare, but don’t forget Bill has connections, connections, and more connections. I have watched Mrs. Clinton talking pessimism and fear throughout the country. Reminds me of the woman in black dancing around a kettle, saying bubble, bubble, toil and trouble. If you can visualize this with me, you will know what her election would mean. She will be like a Joe Btfsplk to our economy, our security, and our promise.

May God continue to bless the USA!