For those who say Clinton was a good President, consider this: he used what he called the peace dividend and cut the military - then as the terrorists bombed our embassies, the first attack on the towers, the Cole, he took NO action. When the Monica incident happened, he, being the tail, wagged the dog and sent the Air Force into Bosnia, and after a few months, the Serbian forces gave up. Our great General there at the time was Wesley Clark. Should Hillary win the election, guess who her Secretary of Defense would be? And as far as I am concerned, he would be another Secretary of Defense in the manner of another Democrat, Les Aspen - remember Black Hawk Down?

I am sure world opinion was glad to see us put our tail between our legs and leave Somalia. The Clinton administration didn’t rock the boat, and the reason the economy was good was because of the Republicans taking back the Congress in 1994. They passed the welfare program and some other programs, which Clinton signed, and they helped the economy. Then the dot com bubble came, and when it burst in 2000, we went into recession and Bush inherited the problem - what with all Clinton’s skulduggery, giving technology to China and in return getting campaign contributions from them. This continues with Hillary and Norman Hsu. I don’t know what happened to Charlie Tree, Clinton’s buddy.

As far as Bill’s morality is concerned, it was like a dog in heat. The Democrats didn’t mind his rape and sexual harassment. I would say this reflects quite poorly on Democrats who froth at the mouth if some Republican does something wrong. Remember Foley? But Barney Frank had a gay sex bordello in his home and nothing happened. John Tower was known as a womanizer and drinker and he was denied a cabinet post because of this - double standards abound. Senator Packwood was forced to resign for groping women, but Clinton could rape and grope and the Democrats LOVE him. I ask you, would you want Clinton back in the White House with his wife?

The winning of the Iowa caucus by Huckabee doesn’t prove that he would be a good President - only that the evangelist Christians in Iowa can easily be led like sheep by a good huckster, not a good shepherd. Huckabee, with his guitar playing, sorta reminds me of “A Face in the Crowd” - check that out. I don’t think he is the goody two shoes people think he is, and he is definitely not a Conservative - look at his record on taxes and immigration, also crime. Not my cup of tea! How come he is not getting beat up like Dukakis did in releasing a criminal who killed again? What about his pardoning a record number of criminals?

His talking about all the Pakistanis crossing our border and that Marshall Law in Pakistan should be eliminated after it had been done two weeks prior makes me wonder about his foreign policy. Who is going to be his adviser - Chuck Norris? He didn’t know Iran had stopped their nuke program. He said Pakistanis were second only to Latin America, illegally entering through our border, which was definitely not true. He apologized about the assassination of Bhutto. WE didn’t do it! What kind of foreign policy could he have?

Now we get to Mr. McCain, the media darling. Boy, are they giving him good coverage. He and Kennedy tried to give illegal immigrants amnesty and a path to citizenship, which would greatly increase the Democrats base and destroy the Republican party. McCain also teamed up with Feingold to change rules on campaigns that benefit the Democrats. It spawned the 527s that are one of the worst things that ever occurred in political practices. Way to go McCain. McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts. Who was he trying to help? Why doesn’t he change his party affiliation to Democrat and run against Hillary and Obama? Let’s not forget the Keating Five. One of his campaign workers is Frank Keating. I don’t know why the media has this strange fascination with McCain, but it’s worth more than money to his campaign. The media also is pushing Huckabee. I think they are trying to destroy the Republican party.

The country is heading towards becoming a country with very few caucasians because of the birth rate of other nationalities and the immigration of nationalities not caucasian. I don’t know if this will harm the country or not, but this country was built by caucasians and I haven’t seen great democracies built by Latin America and India, where it’s for sure not all people are created equal. Also Arabian countries, I don’t think any of these espouse equality. Since these countries’ nationalities will represent the greater part of citizens in the United States, what will that bring? Your guess is as good as mine.

May God continue to bless the USA.