The Democratic phony Senators trying to undermine Rush Limbaugh and talk radio - it is so patently dishonest as to be ridiculous. These phony Senators, Harry Reid, Tom Harkin, Dick Durbin, Teddy Kennedy, John Kerry, and COngressman Murtha should be looking at their own statements putting down the U.S. troops. They are doing this with the hope that it will placate their dailykos and moveon.org crowd. It may very well do this because those people are programmed by George Soros and other scourges of the earth. They are programmed to just HATE and follow their master’s voice. If I ever heard one give any indication that they actually reasoned in any manner or tried to arrive at a logical conclusion, I wouldn’t say that.

One of the most pathetic of these is Alan Colmes, who pretends to think for himself, but goes with the flow with whatever he is told to say. George Soros has so many robots in the Senate, media, and Congress that he must have to work his minions real hard to keep control of that herd. I would surely hate to be branded as one of his robots. He is one ugly human being, both outside and in. I wish him the best the devil can give him along with those of his followers that wish to weaken the country and force everyone to live by political correctness, which is the most potent tool they have for accomplishing this.

What can we do about the judges that will not allow laws to be enforced that were voted on and passed by citizens of cities and states? This never fails to amaze me. Supposedly, this country is law-based, but liberal judges supported by the Democratic party, moveon.org, George Soros, and other Democratic party controllers abrogate the laws. It seems to me these judges place themselves above the law. Speaking of laws, who are they for? States and cities will not enforce immigration laws. I believe they call that scofflaw. Yet, they expect their citizens to follow laws on burglary, rape, murder, theft, assault, and all kinds of ordinances like traffic laws, zoning laws, and many, many others, but they are, apparently, above the law.

If you don’t follow laws yourself, how can you expect your citizens to do anything but feel that those laws are unimportant. States and cities, by placing themselves above the law of the federal government, have weakened that same government. The government withholds funds to states if they don’t go by seatbelt laws and other laws of a similar nature. How come they can’t withhold funds for failure to enforce immigratin laws, especially since they not only fail to enforce the law, but actually work against it? Also, they should withhold education funds to states who allow schools to teach prince falling in love with a prince - how sick. See attached:

Democratic Candidates Say They’re OK With Second-Grade Teacher Reading Gay Prince Fairy Tale

Thursday , September 27, 2007

By Catherine Donaldson-Evans
FOX NEWS

A fairy tale about two princes falling in love sparked a backlash — and a lawsuit — against a teacher and a school last year when it was read to a second-grade class in Massachusetts.But the three frontrunners in the Democratic presidential race suggested Wednesday night at their debate in New Hampshire that they’d support reading the controversial book to children as part of a school curriculum.

Moderator Tim Russert asked John Edwards, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton whether they’d be comfortable having the story — called “King & King” — read to their children in school.

Edwards gave the first and most definitive answer — a resounding and instant “yes, absolutely” — although he added that it “might be a little tough” for second-graders.

Obama agreed with Edwards and revealed that his wife has already spoken to his 6- and 9-year-old daughters about same-sex marriage.

Clinton said she believes it’s up to parents to decide how to handle such topics, but added that it’s important to teach kids about the “many differences that are in the world.”

Same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, and, as Russert pointed out Wednesday, most of the Democratic candidates have said they oppose it. But though they don’t back the legislation, they apparently think it’s OK to teach elementary-school students about gay marriage.

“I want my children to understand everything about the difficulties that gay and lesbian couples are faced with every day, the discrimination that they’re faced with every single day of their lives,” Edwards said. “I suspect my two younger children, Emma Claire, who’s 9, and Jack, who’s 7, will reach the same conclusion that my daughter Cate, who’s 25, has reached — which is, she doesn’t understand why her dad is not in favor of same-sex marriage.”

The 2004 vice presidential candidate and former North Carolina senator said he doesn’t want to influence his kids’ opinions about the issue.

“I don’t want to make that decision on behalf of my children,” he said. “I want my children to be able to make that decision on behalf of themselves, and I want them to be exposed to all the information, even in — did you say second grade? Second grade might be a little tough, but even in second grade to be exposed to all those possibilities, because I don’t want to impose my view. Nobody made me God.”

Obama told Russert that his sentiments are similar to those of Edwards, and, when asked whether he’d sat down to talk about same-sex marriage with his young daughters, he replied that his wife had.

“The fact is, my 9-year-old and my 6-year-old I think are already aware that there are same-sex couples,” the Illinois senator told the debate. “One of the things I want to communicate to my children is not to be afraid of people who are different. …. One of the things I think the next president has to do is stop fanning people’s fears. If we spend all our time feeding the American people fear and conflict and division, then they become fearful and conflicted and divided.”

Clinton said she respects the viewpoints of Obama and Edwards, but she sidestepped the question of whether she’d be comfortable having a storybook like “King & King” read to her own child at that age.

“With respect to your individual children, that is such a matter of parental discretion,” Clinton said. “Obviously, it is better to try to … help your children understand the many differences that are in the world. … And that goes far beyond sexual orientation. So I think that this issue of gays and lesbians and their rights will remain an important one in our country.”

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who is vying for the Republican nomination for president, weighed in afterward with a statement accusing the Democratic candidates of being “out of touch” with America.

“Not one candidate was uncomfortable with young children learning about same-sex marriage in the second grade,” Romney said in the statement. “This is a subject that should be left to parents, not public school teachers. We need to strengthen our families by passing a federal marriage amendment and also insisting on marriage before having children. Change in Washington requires Democrats with the courage to stand up to their ultra liberal base and do what’s right for our children.”

Some Lexington, Mass., parents were livid that a Joseph Estabrook Elementary School teacher read “King & King” to their second-grade children in class.

The Dutch tale, which has been translated into English, is about a prince whose mother pressures him to find a princess but who ends up falling in love with and marrying the brother of one of the prospective brides instead.

Last year, a judge dismissed a federal lawsuit brought by two sets of parents of students in the class who objected to the introduction of homosexual themes to their 7-year-olds without alerting them first, on the grounds that it was a violation of the state’s sex-education parental notification clause.

School officials stood by their decision to teach about different kinds of marriage and said that Massachusetts law requires them to do so.

The continuing furor by the Democratic Senate, Congress, media, and talking Democratic talking heads is actually so pathetic as to be funny. Talk about conformity to the Democratic talking points. Years ago, kids said they wanted to be non-conformists, but they all dressed alike, wore their hair alike, and were taught to think alike. I hate to say it, but I think they all grew up to be Democrats because they are the true conformists. Taking something completely out of context and making something horrific out of it to cover up how the Democratic party is so anti-military is disgusting! They will not succeed in covering up their attack on General Petraeus, no matter how desperate they get. This attack is reminiscent of the Third Reich and how they managed statements to lead their people to such an anti-semite thinking, that they were able to justify their holocaust.

• Can you tell me why, after ten years and constant media coverage of Diana, she’s still in the news? What laws did she pass - what did she do for her country, except give birth to an heir to the thrown?
• The Democratic bid to the people for votes with their give-away programs is getting outrageous. The S-chip program and the $5,000 for each newborn is nothing short of buying votes.
• Will someone please tell Governor Schwarzenegger that his state SUCKS! They have homosexuals dressed provocatively with sex toys making fun of the Last Supper. Then they have an airport that won’t allow returning servicemen (heroes) from Iraq in their terminal.
• We have always had all kinds of religions - Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Judaism, and Christianity. How come we seem to have had no major problems until we got the religion of Islam?
• Can the government use anti-scofflaws to punish states and cities that don’t go by the immigration laws?

May God continue to bless the USA!